
LIBERALIZATION OF DEFERRED PAYMENTS UNDER FEMA
If you have questions or would like additional information on the material covered herein, please contact:
If you have questions or would like additional information on the material covered in this Newsletter, please contact the authors:
By:Seema Jhingan, Partner
(sjhingan@lexcounsel.in)
Neha Yadav, Senior Associate
(nyadav@lexcounsel.in)
Saniya Kothari, Associate
(skothari@lexcounsel.in)

LIBERALIZATION OF DEFERRED PAYMENTS UNDER FEMA
1. Introduction
1.1. Deferment of payments in share purchase transactions between non-resident buyers and resident sellers
till recently required prior approval of the Reserve Bank of India (“RBI”) under Regulation 10 of the Foreign
Exchange Management (Transfer or Issue of Security by a Person Resident Outside India) Regulations,
2000 (“FEMA Transfer Regulations”).
1.2. Further, authorized dealer banks in India were allowed to open escrow accounts towards payment of share
purchase consideration (subject to various terms and conditions specified by RBI), but the escrow account
could only be operational for a limited period of 6 months.1 In all other cases of opening/maintaining escrow accounts for FDI-related transactions, prior approval from the RBI was necessary.
2. Liberalization brought in by Regulation 10A
2.1. The above regime on deferred payments has been liberalized by the introduction of a new Regulation 10A
(“New Regulation”) in the FEMA Transfer Regulations, vide Notification No. FEMA.368/2016-RB dated
May 20, 2016.2
2.2. Per the New Regulation, RBI has permitted payment of purchase consideration in cases of transfer of
shares by or between a resident buyer and a non-resident seller or vice-versa, on a deferred payment
basis, specifically, on the terms given below:
The amount of deferred consideration should not exceed 25% of the total consideration payable by
the buyer under the relevant transfer transaction;
The deferred consideration should however be paid by the buyer within a period not exceeding
eighteen (18) months from the date of the transfer agreement.
2.3. Escrow Arrangement:
2.3.1. For this purpose, an escrow arrangement may also be made between the buyer and the seller for the
deferred consideration (being an amount not exceeding 25% of the total consideration) for a period not
exceeding 18 months from the date of the transfer agreement.3
2.3.2. Worthwhile to note in this context is the fact that the period of 18 months would begin from the date of the
transfer agreement (and not the actual closing of the transfer of shares), thereby not taking into account the
time lags which are common between the execution of share purchase/transfer agreements and the actual
closing of the transaction including the time taken for completion of conditions precedent for effecting
transfer.
2.3.3. That said, this mechanism would of course be of use in share transfer transactions where parties can
agree to fulfill conditions precedent before execution of the share transfer agreements or as conditions
subsequent to closing. This mechanism could also be relied on to hold-back part of the consideration
(which was so far not possible under international sale transactions) for securing indemnification rights of
the purchasers or as a means to achieve mutually agreed post-closing purchase price adjustments.
2.3.4. In a nutshell, the RBI has permitted the following escrow mechanisms under the extant FEMA regime (in
the context of share purchase consideration payable for acquisition of shares)
6 months Escrow:
o The entire share purchase consideration can be brought into India and be kept in an escrow
account for a limited period of 6 months (from the date of opening of the account).
o In cases, where proposed acquisition/ transfer does not materialize, the authorized dealer bank
may allow repatriation/ refund of the entire amount lying to the credit of the Escrow account,
without RBI approval.
18 months Escrow:
o Escrow accounts can also be opened for a limited period of 18 months (from the date of transfer
agreement) for deferred payments (not exceeding 25% of the total consideration).
o However, the RBI in the New Regulation has not delved into the mechanism for remittance of this
Deferred Consideration back to non-resident acquirer (say in case the seller fails to meet the
requirements/conditions on which the deferred payment was contingent).
2.4. Indemnity:
2.4.1. If the total consideration is paid by the buyer to the seller, the New Regulation allows the seller to furnish
an indemnity for an amount not exceeding 25% of the total consideration for a period not exceeding (18)
months from the date of the payment of the full consideration.
2.4.2. It has been quite common for parties to agree on specific seller indemnity terms in share purchase
transactions. However, these indemnity provisions are often uncapped, or if capped are often capped to
the entire amount of the purchase consideration.
2.4.3. Further, the time period for such indemnification obligations is usually contractually agreed and the
limitation period is usually linked to the statutory period of limitation such as three (3) years or a longer
period of seven years in case of taxation matters.
2.4.4. Typically, indemnification provisions are contractually agreed between the Parties and such
indemnification obligations of seller(s) are often included in the share purchase arrangements without any
caps or limitations (without the requirement of any RBI approval, with the understanding that remittance of
claimed amounts to the non-resident buyer in fulfillment such indemnity obligations, may require RBI
approval at a later stage).
2.4.5. While the New Regulation intended to provide additional safeguard to the purchaser in case the full
consideration has been paid to the seller at the time of transfer of shares/securities, however, the language
of the New Provision (which allows furnishing of indemnities for only an amount not exceeding 25% of the
total consideration and not exceeding a period of 18 months) seems to suggest, that furnishing of
indemnities in excess of the aforesaid thresholds would require prior permission of the RBI. That said, it
appears that this may not be the intent of the New Regulation and the parties can continue to include seller
indemnity provisions in the share purchase agreements exceeding the prescribed thresholds as above
and hopefully a clarification will be issued by the RBI in this regard.
3. Concluding Remarks
Providing a much needed flexibility to buyers and sellers to agree on mutual terms of payments, the New
Regulation allows parties to defer acquisition cost if need be, and structure such deferred payments either
through an escrow mechanism or in case of fully payment of consideration secure the interest of buyers
by way of furnishing of a seller specific indemnity. Keeping the above discussed ambiguities and nuances of this amendment aside, these relaxations would definitely be helpful in cases where payment of purchase
consideration is dependent on contingencies and certain milestone performance based conditions.
Endnotes
1Introduced vide RBI/2010-11/ 498 A. P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 58 dated May 02, 2011 – Opening of Escrow Accounts for FDI transactions.
2“10A.In case of transfer of shares between a resident buyer and a non-resident seller or vice-versa, not more than twenty-five percent of the
total consideration can be paid by the buyer on a deferred basis within a period not exceeding eighteen months from the date of the transfer
agreement. For this purpose, if so agreed between the buyer and the seller, an escrow arrangement may be made between the buyer and the
seller for an amount not more than twenty-five percent of the total consideration for a period not exceeding eighteen months from the date of
the transfer agreement or if the total consideration is paid by the buyer to the seller, the seller may furnish an indemnity for an amount, not more
than twenty-five percent of the total consideration for a period not exceeding eighteen months from the date of the payment of the full
consideration
Provided the total consideration finally paid for the shares must be compliant with the applicable pricing guidelines.”
3This also seems to be in line with the already existing provision under the Foreign Exchange Management (Deposit) Regulations, 2016; which
had provided that in case of transfer of shares between a resident buyer and a non-resident seller or vice-versa, if so agreed between the buyer
and the seller, an escrow arrangement may be made between the buyer and the seller for an amount not more than twenty-five percent of the
total consideration for a period not exceeding eighteen months from the date of the transfer agreement
Feedback
Disclaimer: LexCounsel provides this e-update on a complimentary basis solely for informational purposes. It is not intended to constitute, and should not be taken as, legal advice, or a communication intended to solicit or establish any attorney-client relationship between LexCounsel and the reader(s). LexCounsel shall not have any obligations or liabilities towards any acts or omission of any reader(s) consequent to any information contained in this e-newsletter. The readers are advised to consult competent professionals in their own judgment before acting on the basis of any information provided hereby.